In 1924, mutual funds made it possible for everyday investors to buy a basket of stocks in one shot. In 1976, index mutual funds took it a step further by letting you buy “the market” at low cost. In 1993, ETFs added intraday trading and even better tax efficiency. The latest step in that evolution is direct indexing, holding the individual stocks of an index in your own account so you get broad market exposure and the ability to customize and manage taxes in ways a traditional fund can’t.
Not long ago, if you wanted to manually mirror the big indexes, you basically needed the wealth of a Rockefeller. For example, to mimic the S&P 500, you’d have to buy hundreds of stocks one by one, in the same proportions as the actual S&P 500, and actively buy and sell those stocks to keep pace with it. Only the ultra-rich could afford the time and trading costs for that. In fact, when direct indexing first came around a few decades ago, it was basically an exclusive club for ultra-high-net-worth investors¹. The rest of us had to settle for ordinary index funds. But not any longer!
What Exactly Is Direct Indexing?
Okay, now that I’ve built it up, let’s clearly define it. Direct indexing means investing in all (or a representative sample) of the individual components of an index directly, rather than buying a fund that tracks that index. Instead of buying an S&P 500 index mutual fund or ETF, you set up a portfolio where you own the stocks yourself (usually via a separately managed account set up by your advisor or platform). You end up with similar exposure to the index – you’re still broadly diversified across the market – but you hold the actual shares of each company in your account.
Why would someone do that? After all, index funds and ETFs are cheap, easy, and wildly popular. To answer that, it helps to remember one of those boring disclosures we always hear: “You can’t invest directly in an index.” You can, however, invest in all the parts of an index, and doing so gives you a degree of control that a prepackaged fund doesn’t. With direct indexing, you essentially create your own personalized index fund.
Mechanically, setting up a direct indexed portfolio is usually handled by an investment manager or a nifty piece of software. They’ll start with the target index (e.g., the Russell 3000 or S&P 500), and buy most or all of the stocks in that index for your account at the proper weights. In practice, very small accounts might buy just a sampled subset to approximate the index – but larger ones can hold every single constituent.
This approach blurs the line between passive and active investing. It’s passive in that you’re tracking an index, but active in that you can customize holdings and trades specifically for you. In a way, direct indexing is bringing a bit of the institutional portfolio management experience to individual investors.
The key is that you own the stocks directly, and that direct ownership is what unlocks the tax efficiency we cover below.
The Rise of Direct Indexing
Direct indexing has indeed surged in popularity. Assets under management in this space nearly doubled between 2020 and 2024—climbing from roughly $350 billion to $864 billion.
That’s a powerful bull run of growth. So why the change?
In a word: technology. Over the past decade or so, several trends converged to lower the drawbridge and “democratize” this strategy. First, trading costs plummeted. Today, we have zero-commission trading on stocks at most brokers. Remember when it cost $10 or more per trade? Those days are gone. Second, the rise of fractional shares means you no longer need huge sums to buy slices of expensive stocks. Want to replicate the S&P 500 but only have a few thousand bucks? Fractional trading lets you buy, say, 0.1 shares of a $3,000 stock to get the right weighting. Third, computing power and portfolio management software have gotten really good. The heavy number-crunching and rebalancing that used to require a team of analysts can now be automated by algorithms in the cloud.
All of this led to a steep drop in the required account size for direct indexing. What used to demand $10 million+ now might require far, far less. In fact, some investment firms have introduced direct indexing for retail investors with account minimums as low as $5,000.
The Potential Benefits of Direct Indexing
So why go through the trouble of holding hundreds of stocks individually? Two big reasons: tax management and personalization.
- Better Tax Efficiency (Especially Tax-Loss Harvesting).
This is often touted as the number one advantage of direct indexing, and it’s a compelling one. If you’ve ever owned a mutual fund in a taxable account, you may have been unpleasantly surprised by capital gains distributions (often at year-end) that you had no control over. With an index ETF, you avoid most capital gains distributions, but you still can’t utilize individual stock losses within the fund – they’re trapped inside. When you directly own the stocks, however, it opens up the strategy of tax-loss harvesting on a whole new level.
This means intentionally selling stocks that have dropped below your purchase price to “harvest” the capital loss, which you can use to offset gains and reduce your tax bill. You then replace that sold stock with another similar stock or ETF (to maintain your market exposure) and potentially avoid wash-sale issues.
Better Tax Efficiency with Direct Indexing

Illustration only. In many years the market rises overall, yet numerous constituents decline. Direct ownership lets you harvest those losses.
Sell a loser below your cost basis to realize a capital loss.
Replace exposure with a similar stock or ETF to stay invested and manage wash-sale rules.
Use the loss to offset capital gains and potentially reduce your tax bill.
Actual tax outcomes depend on your circumstances. Consider coordination with your advisor and tax professional.
This is a big deal. Consider that in any given year, even if the overall market goes up, there will be plenty of individual stocks that go down. For example, in 2024, the S&P 500 delivered an impressive total return of about 25% (SlickCharts, FT Portfolios). Despite that broad rally, roughly a third of its constituents—about 170 stocks—still ended the year lower (Morningstar/MarketWatch). And while not all were severely battered, nearly 100 were down by at least 10%, and more than 50 fell by 20% or more (Morningstar/MarketWatch). That kind of divergence speaks volumes.
If you held an index fund, those individual stock losses didn’t do you any good – your fund just reported a great year overall, and that was that. But a direct indexing investor could harvest losses from those declining positions, using them to offset other gains in their portfolio or even ordinary income (up to the annual limit).
- Personalization and Customization. Taxes aside, another major appeal of direct indexing is the ability to customize your holdings. With a normal index fund, you’re stuck with whatever the index provider includes. Don’t like tobacco companies or oil producers? Too bad – if they’re in the index, you own them indirectly. With direct indexing, you’re in charge. You can tweak the index to better fit your values, goals, or existing exposures. Here are some ways an investor might customize a direct indexed portfolio for their needs:
Personalization & Customization
Build a portfolio that reflects YOUR values and goals
Standard Index Fund
One-size-fits-all approach
You get what the index includes
Direct Indexing
Tailored to your preferences
You control what you own
Values-Based Investing
Screen out industries that don't align with your principles
Concentration Management
Reduce overlap with existing large positions
Factor Tilts
Emphasize value, growth, or thematic preferences
Custom Blends
Combine multiple indexes in one account
- Values-based investing (ESG/SRI): You can screen out certain industries or companies that don’t align with your environmental, social, or governance principles. For example, you could exclude tobacco companies, or gun manufacturers, or heavily polluting industries – whatever you personally object to. Your custom index can reflect your values by omitting those names, while still tracking the overall market as closely as possible with the remaining stocks.
- Concentrated stock adjustment: If you have a big position in a single stock already (say, from your employer or a long-term holding), direct indexing lets you avoid doubling down on that exposure. For instance, if you’re a tech executive with a lot of your company’s stock, you might tell the direct indexing manager to exclude or underweight that stock in your portfolio. You’ll reduce overlap and risk, whereas a standard index fund might overexpose you to a sector you’re already heavy in.
- Factor or thematic tilts: Want to lean your portfolio toward certain factors like value stocks, momentum stocks, or specific themes? With direct indexing, you can. You might start with a broad index but decide to overweight companies with higher ESG scores, or tilt toward smaller-cap stocks, or strip out a sector you think is overvalued. Essentially, you can customize the weights of your index to reflect your outlook or preferences, rather than accepting the one-size-fits-all weighting of an index fund.
- Blending indexes/custom benchmarks: You’re not limited to off-the-shelf indexes either. Maybe you want a portfolio that’s 70% S&P 500 and 30% international stocks – a direct indexing approach can combine multiple indices within one account and manage it holistically. Or if you have a unique benchmark in mind (say, an index excluding a certain sector), that can potentially be implemented. In short, direct indexing turns the passive index investing concept into more of a customizable experience.
- Control Over Realized Gains (Asset Location & Transitions). This one is a bit more technical, but worth noting. Because you own the individual stocks, you have more say over when gains are realized. With a mutual fund, if the manager sells a stock at a big gain, all holders might get hit with a taxable distribution that year. In direct indexing, you (or your manager) decide if and when to sell a stock that’s gone up. You might purposely hold on to highly appreciated stocks (to defer gains) unless there’s a good reason to sell. Or if you need to raise cash, you can choose to sell specific positions that minimize your tax hit (like those with higher cost basis).
You can also donate appreciated stocks directly to charity from your portfolio, which is a very tax-efficient way to give (and then perhaps repurchase similar stocks to keep your allocation). Furthermore, if you’re coming into a direct index portfolio with existing stock holdings, the manager can integrate those in-kind rather than forcing you to sell everything and realize gains. This flexibility can save a ton in taxes for someone transitioning a large portfolio.
Control Over Realized Gains
Asset Location & Tax-Smart Transitions
Mutual Funds
- Manager decides when to sell
- Forced taxable distributions
- No control over tax timing
Direct Indexing
- Choose specific positions to sell
- Defer gains strategically
- Donate appreciated stocks
- In-kind transfers possible
Now, I must put on my compliance hat for a moment: None of this is magic or guaranteed. Tax benefits depend on individual circumstances. And customization has to be done carefully – stray too far from the index and your performance can deviate a lot. But when done prudently, these benefits can be very real. They’re the reason direct indexing has been called a blend of the best of passive and active investing. You get the low-cost, diversified market exposure plus some extra benefits (tax alpha and personalized tilts).
In Conclusion
Investing has come a long way from simply buying an index fund and calling it a day. Direct indexing takes the same broad-market exposure investors love and adds three powerful upgrades: more control, deeper customization, and potential tax savings that were once reserved for institutions and ultra-wealthy investors.
If you’ve got a large tax bill on the horizon, want to align your portfolio with your values, or simply want to fine-tune your market exposure, direct indexing might be worth exploring. My role is to evaluate when strategies like this make sense (and when they don’t) so you can pursue your goals in the most effective way possible.
Click the button below to schedule your review, and we’ll see if direct indexing could be a smart addition to your portfolio.